The so-called "federation" cult of "Anna and crew," doth appear to blossom under the avalanche of Granny's artsy rhetorical flourish, with all the glory of an old drowning rat.
When this geriatric fellowship of actors tells the rest of us it's going to finally quell continuing confusion, it means they're about to do the opposite. And, as becomes clear in every instance, for a very specific purpose.
Usually to shore up weak spots in the narrative, it appears. Here "they" are at it again. Inexplicable her followers arrived at a point in their awakening only to surrender all objective cognitive faculties in blind trust of such a fantastic fairy tale. Add to that they are americans, and adults, even many men, who unabashedly say "i follow Anna!" "Anna says..." "Has Anna said anything about this?" "Anna! Anna! Anna! We love you Anna..."
The mindless minions thinking they're recomposing our 'original,' lawful government remain willfully ignorant of even the elementary principles of our Provenances. Because they follow Anna, their informer; "the one who informs." And Anna faithfully leads them all astray.
They do not go to the source for their information, they follow Anna, believe Anna, without question.
They do not go to the archives to discover the origins, foundations, order in constructing our form of government. They depend on manuals and instructions from Anna. The trusted "fiduciary." Let's see if she's trustworthy, faithful and true?
Nope! Nope. and nope. Is it Too hard for someone claiming de facto fiduciary office in the necessity, to be clear with their words, and tell the truth? It is for this one, self-evidently. People, do words have meanings? according to english rules of grammar and common sense, should two different words with different meanings be used interchangeably as if synonymous? Might this lead to confusion?
This article focuses again on the words "federation" and "confederation." In service of peace, true information, quelling continuing confusion intentionally being caused and stirred by the 'federation,' at the expense of a briefly longer post, we include for all to see the definitions; of both;
noun
noun: federation; plural noun: federations
a group of states with a central government but independence in internal affairs.
an organization or group within which smaller divisions have some degree of internal
autonomy.
"the best tag team in the World Wrestling Federation"
the action of forming states or organizations into a single group with
centralized control.
"a first step in the federation of Europe"
Origin
mid 17th century: from late Latin foederatio(n- ), from the Latin verb foederare ‘to ally’, from foedus ‘league’.
confederation, primarily any league or union of people or bodies of people. The term in modern political use is generally confined to a permanent union of sovereign states for certain common purposes—e.g., the German Confederation established by the Congress of Vienna in 1815.
The distinction between confederation and federation—words synonymous in their origin—has been developed in the political terminology of the United States. Until 1789 the U.S. was a confederation; then the word federation, or federal republic, was introduced as implying closer union. This distinction was emphasized during the American Civil War when the seceding states formed a confederation (Confederate States of America) in opposition to the Federal Union. Confederation thus came to mean a union of sovereign states in which the stress is laid on the autonomy of each constituent body, while federation implies a union of states in which the stress is laid on the supremacy of the common government." Confederation; Brittannica.com
Finally, notice the following excerpt from the Articles of Confederation. Contrast and compare the above statement "by Anna von Reitz." Keeping in mind the situation, the fiduciary clarifying things to quell confusion;
Judge for yourselves. And see below, how she signs her official International Public Notices, and most other posts;
What can be concluded form this? And those responsible? What is their angle? Must be more than naked usurpation via constructive fraud and semantic deceit? Two things "she" oft accuses the perps of the Great Fraud of practicing, masters of the art of projection.
This tutorial of language convention she uses to clarify our Provenances, circles round to the same repetitious claim that "The United States of America," so stiled, "is the proper name of our Federation of States."
The Articles of "Confederation" establishes "The United States of America" is the proper name of our Confederation of States called "this confederacy!"
Trust us, we're honest!? Why can't they disclose facts without such gross unnecessary confusion? Why constantly call our confederacy a federation? And NEVER about that sentence in the Articles proving her wrong? Why repeat this tired bogus mantra so incessantly?
The efforts of Anna, husband James and all other mystery players of the federation are NOT transparent, honest, in good faith, and ARE without standing to act or speak on behalf of us or Our Perpetual Union; The United States of America.
The phrase "Anna and crew" was coined specifically from the lack of disclosure and transparency from Anna. Crafted in necessity of response for the oft asked question "who or what is the federation?" Because there is no full disclosure, the followers created their own answer. And it remains in use apparently satisfying all curiosity.
Aaaah, now we see what they're after. Our status of "delegator" is the shiny precious they covet? Doing some contortions to wrangle standing, and delegator status, it appears. Like the pope with their 'successor to peter' laughable claim. Anna has her husband King James the Belcher! Hereditary head of state!? Yup. Her words. And she wasn't laughed into oblivion by intelligent American adults. Rather, they accept everything she says, in preference to the manifest truths readily available to them.
A new character called Bubba was recently mentioned as a member of the 80+ avg age handful comprising the 'federation.' Another most recently introduced "the Professor." Kinda like Gilligans Island meets the beverly hillbillies...
That's the level of disclosure the followers have accepted to date. And set busily doing her bidding, building her thing, her way. Woe!
Frustrating indeed to watch one's countrymen turn into mindless automatons repeating Anna's words out of their mouths. They're out of the race. Ineffective. Blind leading the blind to the ditch.
Every Anna article on Anna's website says " by Anna von Reitz." But if you click document properties, author is attributed to Paul Stramer? Odd?
And there's still the old favorite: self-declared "in service of his holiness francis.." Now that he's dead, will she disclose who she works for now?
Anna has been fully notified multiple times. Given opportunities for clarifying questions, and full disclosure. Opportunity to remove doubt (as if there is any) by taking an oath, she absolutely refused to do any of the above. Is in gross breach of trust of whatever fiduciary responsibilities she could claim to have.
Nevertheless, "She" continues spewing her witchery, trying to keep her spell going as long as possible...
She's naked ol' granny! Won't be long til her followers start waking up and seeing her wretched lewdness.
One hopes..
Hands off our property! We are rightful heirs of full age of majority and maturity, in undisputed possession of all our Provenances, including our Perpetual Union, which Washington state is not a member. Cant be grannied in after thru sorcery, either.
by Paul Raymond Whipple
New Hampshire the Elder
The United States of America
"My son, Guard the Trust!"
We are about our father's Business. We do not shrink back from our responsibilities, and are busy fulfilling our duties. For our God and Country!
http://www.paulstramer.net/2025/05/international-public-notice-to-quell.html?m=1
ReplyDeletehttps://www.facebook.com/share/p/1NzB4UtzKU/
ReplyDeletehttps://www.facebook.com/share/p/1C4s7Hyf5s/
ReplyDelete