January 6, 2021 A day that will live in infamy? Open Questions For the Assembly

January 6, 2021 A day that will live in infamy?

1. Did Francis lull the assembly to seal the steal?Paul Raymond WhippleJanuary 7, 2021 at 3:21 PM

   Was there any hidden hand in the abdication yesterday of the people claiming responsibility to represent the real interests of the real people, among the powers that be aka high contracting powers? You know, the real adults in the room, who always talk over the children. They who decide for the rest of us, and what they say, goes.
   THEY met yesterday, to decide again. But it was commonly known that the old system was dead, so this was not ordinary as it would decide the new system of government for America.
   It was common knowledge the president acknowledged by stating several times he was there to give power back to the people.
   It was common knowledge the full congress would assemble for the electoral college. The time and place for these decisions.
   The people and priority interested party were publicly notified and invited to the time and place of decision. By the President no less.
   The appointed day arrived and the assembly took place. The republicans and democrats were there representing secondary interests. The people who heard and felt interested also came.
   The people were allowed in the capitol building at which point the secondary interested parties stood down and abdicated. They recessed themselves away to hide from their creditors. What now was to be their fate?
   After a few hours of holding the capitol, it was assumed sufficient, and they were asked to leave. The people left and went home.
   Then the other 2 parties returned to see!
   "What form of government have they given us?" What did they decide?
   Having looked around, nothing meaningful was discovered as having been done by the people. Only disturbance, disorder, and damage. Apparently only the children came and to disrupt the truly responsible adults. So the 2 parties resumed the status quo, and the new thing, an offspring of the beast which the people couldve slain in the womb and prevented ever coming here, was conjurred to grow on our land.
   The table was set and all parties notified. The high contracting powers met and it was decided the communist technocracy of America. The shiny new giant in the land.
   Do those representing us at the big table not have eyes to see and ears to hear?
   They did not feel addressed by the invitation? What we are doing has nothing to do with that?
   Of all people on the planet, why did the leaders not sense a outstretched hand in that invitation? This I cant figure out, to whom was he speaking besides the specific priority interest of record with the full published voluminous record of action and claim by the people?
   What if the assembly showed up prepared with that complete record, at the appointed time and place to decide such? And they went in? And the subcontractors fled? And the People occupied their House and read the Law?! In hearing of 150000 now free Americans outside?
   But the people of the assembly didnt show. Would that outcome not have interested them? Judge for yourselves the focus of information presented as relevant and important in the past few weeks. That is time the people couldve been preparing for the big day. What kinda stuff took priority? Because thats what we got from those responsible to be in that meeting on our behalf. Instead of, it is possible; we couldve had it all.

   Did Francis lull the assembly to seal the steal? If she was working against us she could not have done much more to weaken our position. Especially with those she mentions who dismiss the criminality of their subcontractors because "the people voted for em, knowing full well." Imagine what that lawless one will say now that we knew the old was finished. We knew he had no lawful right to foist another corporate fraud on us. We knew the chair was vacant/office dissolved. We knew the decision for the new would be made 1/6/21 when the electoral college meets.            We were invited to the capitol by the President for the event. All interested parties were notified and presumably appeared. The National Assembly had served mountains of truth in the matter, which rightly needed to be the basis of any remedial outcome. Who else had standing? This was all set up for you, even BY you in very real ways, but you did not come. What were we to think? What were we to do?  As yet I fail to see how the abdication by the assembly does not turn the defacto into duly authorized? 
2. Little doubt who the speaker was addressing in her evil glee "Those who tried to tear us from our responsibilities,  have failed!"  
3. By: Paul Raymond Whipple                                        Sullivan County coordinator.                                        New Hampshire 
4.